Today's Work Ethic is a New Work Ethic
Published by Ryan Paugh on April 3rd, 2007 in Productivity | 6 CommentsAs a precursor to this post, I recommend checking out "Today's work ethic just no longer works," a piece found in the March 25 edition of The Boston Globe.
"The work ethic is dead!" I killed it! But I can't take all the credit. If you classify yourself as a Millennial you're also a culprit.
According to Dale Dauten, a syndicated columnist for The Boston Globe, the Millennial view of work is nothing more than "something to do with your hands while chatting on your cell phone…unless it's something to do with your mouth while text messaging."
My initial reaction to this absolute rant was to ignore it. People say stupid things every day. If I replied to every unsupported remark someone wrote I'd have premature Carpal Tunnel by the end of the week. But wait…isn't this guy writing for a reputable newspaper?
That right there just "grinds my gears." Can anyone write anything about my generation and get away with it? On the Internet, okay. In a newspaper, this has to be a joke.
Our friend over on Generations@Work said it best: "Just make the accusation, somebody will believe it. If you repeat a lie or a rumor often enough, it becomes the truth. Gee, where have we seen this before?"
Where have we seen this before? Basically in any situation throughout history where someone felt fear, and in that fear decided to fabricate a story that reinforces his reasoning to be scared. Dauten's only problem is, he's not very good at it. Good propaganda at least has some sort of backward research associated with its purpose.
By the end of this three-paragraph delusion, Dauten actually pointed out something very essential to being recognized in the business, a "Contribution Ethic." He's got something there, but a half of a page worth of proving nothing followed by an epiphany doesn't qualify any advice giving.
Below I highlight a few elements of Dauten's "Contribution Ethic" Top Ten and provide a little insight on how the Millennials will play into this model.
1. Just help. Make yourself useful. You aren't just there, waiting. There's no waiting. Just help.
Sometimes that's easier said than done. Maybe back in the day it was easy to get involved without a little "how-to" guidance, but the world has changed. Business is bigger, faster and overwhelming for an entry-level. The truth is, some of us are just waiting. We're trying to keep busy, but unless managers can take some time out to immerse us into the culture, we won't seem like we're worth our salaries.
3. Your half is 60 percent.
That's just not the way we see things. There's no halves, or thirds, or divisions of any kind in the mind of a Millennial. We're team players. Our half is 100 percent, or even better 110 percent. Doing our 60 percent is not what we consider being done. We're done when our team is done.
4. Innovation is a subversive activity. You can't expect management and/or co-workers to drool with excitement over your "I have an idea!" After all, most ideas are suggestions and most suggestions are complaints. On the other hand, if an idea is truly original, then expect resistance; indeed, welcome it as a measure of originality. Organizations are built for continuity not creativity. That's why you need to demonstrate how the idea will work, and you might need the guerrilla's wiles. Ideas are nothing next to proposals; proposals are nothing next to experiments.
The only problem I have here is relating ideas to complaints. I carry a notebook, and I write down every stupid idea that comes into my head. When I forget my notebook, I beat myself up over it. I don't care if the idea never gets recognized, but here's my philosophy: "In every stupid idea, there's a great idea. And in every great idea, there's a millionaire." So maybe every once in awhile managers might want to take a fresh look at things and hear what their entry-levels have to say. I've said it before – what do you have to lose?
5. Giving time without attention is a gift-wrapped empty box.
Touché…which is why if you want to rant about someone's generation, you better give some attention to the research.
That Millennial lackey sitting in the cube across from you chatting on his cell phone and updating his profile on MySpace doesn't represent our generation. That "Johnny," as Dauten would, call him, is nothing more than the irregularity that all generations face - the one without a clue.
Furthermore, we're not "Johnnies" or "Janies" for that matter. We're Millennials, and to describe us so typically is just an insult to what I believe is a generation with limitless potential.
TOP POSTS
RELATED POSTS
TOP CATEGORIES
- Activism (2)
- Blogging (39)
- Books (13)
- Brazen Careerist (13)
- Career Development (105)
- Career Development (20)
- Community (4)
- Employment (52)
- Entrepreneurship (50)
- Friends (1)
- Generation Y (26)
- Humor (54)
- Marketing (6)
- Millennials (8)
- Money (26)
- Noteworthy (49)
- Personal Development (33)
- Politics (3)
- Productivity (45)
- Recruiting (51)
- Site Related (14)
- Social Media (5)
- Technology (11)
- Work (179)
- Work/Life (90)
- View All Categories





Leave your thoughts here. (6 responses)
This article´s comments All Employee Evolution commentsRebecca
Apr 4th, 2007 at 10:15 amI would argue that what boomers see as a lack of work ethic is really a lack of passion and/or focus among millenials towards their jobs. Their are those that may be passionate about a job for a year, but then get tired and move on. This isn't bad, just how we are. Others who are not passionate, will just work to get the job done, but don't feel any loyalty towards the company, which boomers expect. Dynamics of work relationships are changing and millenials don't feel the need to play into office politics or suck up to bosses. It's not for lack of respect, but for lack of interest in maintaining the corporate status quo, and instead using the methods we learned of how to work efficiently- online, texting, on the phone, networking. We have our own ways of effectively communicating and getting the job done, and it works.
That said, not understanding how to play well with others is hurting us and not allowing us to learn alternative viewpoints. Just because we've learned one thing and it works well for us doesn't mean we can't learn from those who have made it work for decades before us. I'm not advocating imitation of boomer methods, but to build upon their ideas, combine them with ours, and come up with something better. Collaboration is the new black, and that means with everyone.
Ryan
Apr 4th, 2007 at 11:00 amRebecca:
I totally agree. Collaboration is key. In a lot of ways this plays into our "team oriented" attitude. For instance, myself and the co-creator of this site often have different viewpoints on how to reach our audience. We're not black/ white about it and most often combine our ideas. The product is always something better than our initial expectations.
I often make a plea to managers in my writing to listen to and observe your Millennial workers with an open mind because our ways of doing things do differ, but if combined with their own rationale, maybe there's potential to create something better than both viewpoints.
That might infuse some of that passion you speak of that some of us lack.
Thanks for your insight!
Jacqui
Apr 4th, 2007 at 11:41 amI don't think there's a real issue with our generation not being willing to learn from those before us. As it stands right now, we really don't have a choice. Until the current managers leave or start to come around to our expectations, we live by their rules.
That being said, I agree with Ryan. Collaboration is the key – and not an unreasonable one at that. We are all adults, right? And regardless of generation, we were taught to learn how to get along. The tough lesson for the boomers is that up until now they have made up such a large percentage fo the population that they never really had to learn to bend to someone else's way of thinking.
Lately, I've heard a lot of people talk about the arrogance of our generation for thinking the world will change to suit us, but a) it will – that's the nature of things, and b) we're no different than the baby-boomers before us. They had the same expectations.
I want to reference a recent post on this site, Some "special" solutions, from March 11, where the guys point out that the boomers raised us this way, and, now that they have to manage us, are wishing they hadn't. I can't help but think that the choice to raise us this way was based on some level of dissatisfaction they had with their situations that they felt forced to endure. Now, even though they've taught us to go after what we want, they want us to sit quietly and take what's dealt to us like they did? How much sense does that make?
That's my rant for the day.
Ryan Paugh
Apr 4th, 2007 at 11:45 amNice rant!
Shweta
Apr 11th, 2007 at 1:20 amWhat we do wrong mostly is we always arrive to streotyping a generation and we have been too quick to do so for the new gen Y.
I truly agree when you say here that "managers might want to take a fresh look at things and hear what their entry-levels have to say. " the communication has to be two-way. The new workforce also has to learn to be tolerant towards the two older generations that they have to share their office space with. The ideology need not clash but the work ethics may be different. We all have to understand that it's not always that "my idea is the best idea" communication and an open dialog is essential for a healthy workplace.
I often hope to get this thinking across through my blog @ http://careerbright.blogspot.com
Ryan Paugh
Apr 11th, 2007 at 2:44 pmShweta,
You're right! Communication does have to be two-way. It's the only way we will ever co-exist in an inter-generational environment.
I also believe that the balance of power is against us (the Millennials), therefore in many ways it's up to managers/supervisors to make the first move. We have no choice, we have to be tolerant, the older generations are our superiors. Generally speaking, they can treat us however they want.
Thanks for your comments! Keep reading!